I know I can do it in Photoshop, but that adds another workflow step with another intermediate file. The ability to blend pictures was simple and yet powerful. Truly I hope this is something we will see in Lightroom at a later time. I have to say that I liked the layer model in Photo RAW a lot. Here, Lightroom is still the leader of the pack, especially when it comes to more complex print layouts. I use the map module a lot, I print a lot and I work a lot with infrared pictures. In the end, none of the alternatives were a perfect fit for my work style. You will be surprised by how much has changed. 1a.Feature comparisonĪre you actually aware of how many features have been added to Lightroom since version 6.12? If you are not 100% sure, I highly recommend reading Victoria Bampton’s post What’s new in Lightroom Classic since Lightroom 6?. And I guess nothing beats the new marketing slogan Artificial Intelligence these days – one click and you are there. I like to create my own presets and apply them sparingly. Tons of presets is also nothing that is of interest to me, quite the opposite. For me, a smooth workflow is more important than maybe a 3% better result in RAW sharpening or color grading. Once you start comparing the latest versions, Lightroom does not feel slow at all.Īlso, I need to mention that I am usually not looking at results at 200% magnification. For a true comparison, you will need to compare against the latest version of Lightroom Classic. It is only true if you compare the software alternatives to the last perpetual Lightroom version 6.12. One of the most heard complaints is the (lack of) speed in Lightroom. I have published an infrared photography specific part of this comparison in my article Why You Should No Longer Consider Luminar 4 for Infrared Photography, if you are interested. For Capture One, I used their evaluation version. I did own licenses for Photo RAW and Luminar and updated them at least twice. 1.Lightroom alternativesīelieve me, I did take my time testing software alternatives to Lightroom. But I encourage you to read on to understand why I came to this conclusion. If you visited this post to read about a non-Adobe alternative, I have to disappoint you. You: Are you f&%$§# kidding me? I hear you. To cut a long story short: My alternative to the Lightroom perpetual license is the Lightroom subscription model. In nearly 3 years, I have tested Phase One Capture One, On1 Photo RAW and Skylum Luminar. But at the same time, I kept looking for an alternative to Lightroom. For a while, I did continue with my perpetual license. Readers of my blog will recall that I was not too happy with Adobe’s choice to remove perpetual licenses.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |